Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Sudanese Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Sudanese
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Sudanese
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
15.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
204th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
72.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Sudanese Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,448,522 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.509 and weighted average of 3.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,125,850 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.369 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 6.3%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Sudanese |
| Minimum | 0.83% | 0.77% |
| Maximum | 13.9% | 6.7% |
| Range | 13.0% | 5.9% |
| Mean | 4.7% | 3.2% |
| Median | 3.7% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.7% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 0.92% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 0.97% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 0.96% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Alsatian (3.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Denmark (3.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Eastern European (3.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Thailand (3.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Hispanic or Latino (3.1%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 20.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 3.1% |
| Syrians | 19.2 /100 | #199 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 19.1 /100 | #200 | Poor 3.1% |
| Iraqis | 19.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 16.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 16.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 3.1% |
| Alsatians | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 3.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 15.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 3.1% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 12.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 12.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 3.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 12.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 3.1% |
| Romanians | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to Sudanese by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Costa Rican (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Lithuania (2.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from France (2.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and Palestinian (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |