Immigrants from Eritrea vs Inupiat Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Eritrea
Inupiat
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Eritrea
Inupiat
5.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
56th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Eritrea vs Inupiat Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,852,788 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eritrea and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.061 and weighted average of 5.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,327,130 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.331 and weighted average of 5.6%, a difference of 2.3%.

Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Eritrea | Inupiat |
Minimum | 0.17% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 13.3% | 18.0% |
Range | 13.1% | 16.9% |
Mean | 5.5% | 5.4% |
Median | 5.4% | 5.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 3.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.3% | 6.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Eritrea and Inupiat by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eritrea are Turkish (5.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Cypriot (5.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Venezuelan (5.5%, a difference of 0.34%), Mongolian (5.5%, a difference of 0.42%), and Argentinean (5.5%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Immigrants from Bulgaria (5.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (5.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Egypt (5.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Jordanian (5.6%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Brazil (5.6%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Turks | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Argentineans | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Taiwanese | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Inupiat | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 5.6% |