Immigrants from Japan vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Japan
Chickasaw
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Japan
Chickasaw
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
66.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Japan vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 340,074,925 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.411 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,680,195 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 51.9%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Japan | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.47% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 17.2% | 21.2% |
| Range | 16.8% | 18.8% |
| Mean | 4.2% | 7.4% |
| Median | 3.1% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.6% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Japan by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Japan are Albanian (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Fiji (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Australia (2.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Central America (3.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Cambodia (3.0%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
| Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 64.9 /100 | #163 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 64.8 /100 | #164 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 64.2 /100 | #165 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 62.9 /100 | #166 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #167 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 57.9 /100 | #168 | Average 3.0% |
| Arabs | 57.6 /100 | #169 | Average 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |