Immigrants from Japan vs Immigrants from Grenada Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Japan
Immigrants from Grenada
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Japan
Immigrants from Grenada
1.9%
VISION DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
23.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
196th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Japan vs Immigrants from Grenada Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 339,950,646 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.324 and weighted average of 1.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,180,438 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.010 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 14.9%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Japan | Immigrants from Grenada |
| Minimum | 0.20% | 0.16% |
| Maximum | 10.6% | 5.1% |
| Range | 10.4% | 4.9% |
| Mean | 2.3% | 2.3% |
| Median | 1.6% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 1.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.4% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.92% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 1.1% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Japan by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Japan are Bulgarian (1.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Lithuania (1.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Asia (1.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Taiwanese (1.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Malaysia (1.9%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Taiwanese | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Grenada by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Grenada are Immigrants (2.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Barbados (2.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Ghanaian (2.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Czechoslovakian (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and British (2.2%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Salvadorans | 27.4 /100 | #189 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 26.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 2.2% |
| Canadians | 25.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 2.2% |
| Europeans | 25.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 2.2% |
| British | 25.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 24.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 23.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 23.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 2.2% |
| Ghanaians | 21.8 /100 | #197 | Fair 2.2% |
| Czechoslovakians | 21.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 21.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 2.2% |
| Slovaks | 18.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 18.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.2% |
| Dutch | 17.1 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.2% |