Immigrants from Japan vs Latvian Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Japan
Latvian
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Japan
Latvians
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
60th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Japan vs Latvian Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 339,768,160 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.697 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,536,730 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.134 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 0.70%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Japan | Latvian |
Minimum | 0.90% | 0.23% |
Maximum | 31.6% | 10.4% |
Range | 30.7% | 10.1% |
Mean | 3.9% | 2.8% |
Median | 2.3% | 2.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 1.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 2.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.86% | 1.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Japan and Latvians by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Japan are Palestinian (2.3%, a difference of 0.10%), New Zealander (2.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Egyptian (2.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Cameroon (2.3%, a difference of 0.25%), and Mongolian (2.3%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Immigrants from Brazil (2.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Malaysia (2.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Kenyan (2.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Serbia (2.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Jordanian (2.3%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Jordanians | 99.7 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Kenyans | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.6 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Australians | 99.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Argentineans | 99.6 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | France | 99.6 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.6 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.6 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.6 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.3% |
New Zealanders | 99.5 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Palestinians | 99.4 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Egyptians | 99.4 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Mongolians | 99.3 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Swedes | 99.3 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 2.3% |