Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Bhutanese Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
Bhutanese
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
Bhutanese
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
69.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
4.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
227th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Bhutanese Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,435,235 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.485 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,292,805 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.313 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 9.2%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Kazakhstan | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 0.67% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 11.3% | 10.5% |
| Range | 10.6% | 8.8% |
| Mean | 3.6% | 4.0% |
| Median | 3.1% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.0% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 1.5% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Poland (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Costa Rican (2.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Australia (2.9%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
| Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 64.9 /100 | #163 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 64.8 /100 | #164 | Good 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Lebanese (3.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Portugal (3.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Latvian (3.2%, a difference of 0.23%), Icelander (3.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and Maltese (3.2%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Latvians | 5.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Lebanese | 5.0 /100 | #226 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Bhutanese | 4.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 4.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Maltese | 4.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Greeks | 3.2 /100 | #230 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 2.9 /100 | #231 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Ukrainians | 2.9 /100 | #232 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Estonians | 2.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Central American Indians | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 3.3% |