Immigrants from Lithuania vs Chinese Disability Age Under 5
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lithuania
Chinese
Disability Age Under 5
Disability Age Under 5 Comparison
Immigrants from Lithuania
Chinese
1.3%
DISABILITY AGE UNDER 5
27.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
200th/ 347
METRIC RANK
1.1%
DISABILITY AGE UNDER 5
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Chinese Disability Age Under 5 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,421,009 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and percentage of population with a disability under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.454 and weighted average of 1.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,046,332 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with a disability under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.035 and weighted average of 1.1%, a difference of 11.1%.
Disability Age Under 5 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Lithuania | Chinese |
Minimum | 0.71% | 0.35% |
Maximum | 17.5% | 4.4% |
Range | 16.8% | 4.0% |
Mean | 3.3% | 1.5% |
Median | 1.5% | 1.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.96% | 0.75% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.5% | 2.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 1.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 0.98% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 0.97% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age Under 5
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania by Disability Age Under 5
In terms of disability age under 5, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Immigrants from Italy (1.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Arapaho (1.3%, a difference of 0.35%), Liberian (1.3%, a difference of 0.37%), Jamaican (1.3%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Europe (1.3%, a difference of 0.41%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age Under 5 |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 36.5 /100 | #193 | Fair 1.3% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 34.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 1.3% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 34.4 /100 | #195 | Fair 1.3% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 31.4 /100 | #196 | Fair 1.3% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 31.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 1.3% |
Immigrants | Norway | 31.1 /100 | #198 | Fair 1.3% |
Jamaicans | 30.7 /100 | #199 | Fair 1.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 27.2 /100 | #200 | Fair 1.3% |
Immigrants | Italy | 25.4 /100 | #201 | Fair 1.3% |
Arapaho | 24.1 /100 | #202 | Fair 1.3% |
Liberians | 24.0 /100 | #203 | Fair 1.3% |
Immigrants | Europe | 23.6 /100 | #204 | Fair 1.3% |
Romanians | 22.5 /100 | #205 | Fair 1.3% |
Immigrants | Poland | 22.4 /100 | #206 | Fair 1.3% |
Nigerians | 21.2 /100 | #207 | Fair 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Disability Age Under 5
In terms of disability age under 5, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Ethiopian (1.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Albanian (1.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Cuba (1.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Spanish American (1.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and Sri Lankan (1.1%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age Under 5 |
Immigrants | Syria | 97.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 1.1% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 97.8 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 1.1% |
Sudanese | 97.7 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 1.1% |
Okinawans | 97.6 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 1.1% |
Ugandans | 97.5 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 1.1% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 97.5 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 1.1% |
Ethiopians | 97.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 1.1% |
Chinese | 97.2 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 1.1% |
Albanians | 97.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 1.1% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 97.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 1.1% |
Spanish Americans | 96.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 1.1% |
Sri Lankans | 96.8 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 1.1% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 96.8 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 1.1% |
Mongolians | 96.6 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 1.1% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 96.5 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 1.1% |