Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Japan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lithuania
Immigrants from Japan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Lithuania
Immigrants from Japan
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
73.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
66.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Immigrants from Japan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,714,489 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.157 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 340,074,925 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.411 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 0.76%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Lithuania | Immigrants from Japan |
Minimum | 2.1% | 0.47% |
Maximum | 5.7% | 17.2% |
Range | 3.5% | 16.8% |
Mean | 3.3% | 4.2% |
Median | 3.2% | 3.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 2.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.5% | 4.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.78% | 1.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.86% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.85% | 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania and Immigrants from Japan by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Immigrants from France (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Palestinian (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Sudanese (2.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and Costa Rican (2.9%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Japan are Albanian (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Fiji (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Australia (2.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Central America (3.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Cambodia (3.0%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Central America | 64.9 /100 | #163 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 64.8 /100 | #164 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 64.2 /100 | #165 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 62.9 /100 | #166 | Good 3.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #167 | Average 3.0% |