Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Chickasaw Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Chickasaw
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Chickasaw
17.3%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
50.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
173rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.5%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Chickasaw Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,181,244 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.357 and weighted average of 17.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,689,565 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.293 and weighted average of 18.5%, a difference of 7.0%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 3.7% | 5.7% |
Maximum | 51.8% | 42.5% |
Range | 48.1% | 36.8% |
Mean | 16.7% | 18.7% |
Median | 16.8% | 18.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.4% | 16.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.5% | 20.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.1% | 4.9% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are Laotian (17.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Tsimshian (17.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Shoshone (17.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Ute (17.3%, a difference of 0.030%), and Spanish (17.3%, a difference of 0.040%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 64.4 /100 | #166 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Syria | 63.5 /100 | #167 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 62.5 /100 | #168 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 61.8 /100 | #169 | Good 17.2% |
Ecuadorians | 59.6 /100 | #170 | Average 17.2% |
Tlingit-Haida | 59.4 /100 | #171 | Average 17.2% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 56.7 /100 | #172 | Average 17.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 50.2 /100 | #173 | Average 17.3% |
Laotians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 17.3% |
Tsimshian | 49.8 /100 | #175 | Average 17.3% |
Shoshone | 49.2 /100 | #176 | Average 17.3% |
Ute | 49.1 /100 | #177 | Average 17.3% |
Spanish | 48.9 /100 | #178 | Average 17.3% |
Sioux | 48.6 /100 | #179 | Average 17.3% |
Pakistanis | 43.9 /100 | #180 | Average 17.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Yaqui (18.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Subsaharan African (18.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Hmong (18.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Choctaw (18.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Dominica (18.6%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 18.3% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 18.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.4% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.4% |
Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.5% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 18.6% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 18.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 18.6% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 18.6% |