Immigrants from Norway vs Immigrants from Iraq Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Norway
Immigrants from Iraq
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Norway
Immigrants from Iraq
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
7.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
216th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
10.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Norway vs Immigrants from Iraq Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,704,469 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.650 and weighted average of 3.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 194,749,544 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Iraq and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.242 and weighted average of 3.1%, a difference of 0.87%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Norway | Immigrants from Iraq |
Minimum | 1.3% | 0.59% |
Maximum | 20.5% | 6.3% |
Range | 19.1% | 5.7% |
Mean | 6.0% | 3.3% |
Median | 4.2% | 3.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.5% | 3.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 0.81% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 0.86% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 0.86% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Iraq by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Russian (3.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.12%), New Zealander (3.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Bangladeshi (3.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and Malaysian (3.2%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Iraq are Pakistani (3.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Romanian (3.1%, a difference of 0.36%), Cape Verdean (3.1%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Hungary (3.1%, a difference of 0.44%), and Immigrants from Latvia (3.1%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 3.1% |
Alsatians | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 3.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 15.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 3.1% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 12.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 12.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 3.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 12.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 3.1% |
Romanians | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 3.1% |
Pakistanis | 11.1 /100 | #212 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 10.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 3.1% |
Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% |
Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% |
Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% |
New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |
Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% |
Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.2% |
Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 3.2% |