Immigrants from Spain vs Zimbabwean Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Spain
Zimbabwean
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Spain
Zimbabweans
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
94.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
101st/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
89.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
118th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Spain vs Zimbabwean Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 239,646,131 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Spain and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.699 and weighted average of 2.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,200,821 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.035 and weighted average of 2.8%, a difference of 1.8%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Spain | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 0.32% | 0.53% |
Maximum | 25.6% | 6.9% |
Range | 25.3% | 6.4% |
Mean | 4.9% | 3.0% |
Median | 2.9% | 2.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 2.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.4% | 3.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 1.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 1.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Spain and Zimbabweans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Spain are Taiwanese (2.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (2.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Indonesia (2.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Guatemala (2.8%, a difference of 0.11%), and Burmese (2.8%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Liberia (2.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Kenyan (2.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants (2.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Latin America (2.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Cambodian (2.8%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 95.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Spain | 94.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Taiwanese | 94.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Burmese | 94.2 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Moroccans | 93.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Hondurans | 93.4 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Chile | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Guatemalans | 93.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Turks | 93.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cypriots | 92.9 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 92.7 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 2.8% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 92.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 91.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cambodians | 91.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 90.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 90.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 2.8% |
Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 2.8% |
Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% |