Immigrants from Syria vs Ute Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Syria
Ute
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Syria
Ute
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
84.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
86.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Syria vs Ute Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 174,106,838 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Syria and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,667,207 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.127 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 0.27%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Syria | Ute |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 14.1% | 26.5% |
| Range | 12.1% | 24.8% |
| Mean | 6.3% | 7.6% |
| Median | 6.0% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 4.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Syria and Ute by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Syria are Immigrants from North Macedonia (6.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Hungary (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zaire (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Czech (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Italy (6.0%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Italy (6.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (6.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Hungary (6.0%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 6.0% |