Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Brazilian Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Brazilian
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Brazilians
10.8%
MALE DISABILITY
93.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
113th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
MALE DISABILITY
85.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
130th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Brazilian Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,811,453 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.645 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,937,131 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.496 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 1.2%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Brazilian |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 4.9% |
| Maximum | 41.0% | 30.6% |
| Range | 39.5% | 25.7% |
| Mean | 14.2% | 12.0% |
| Median | 11.0% | 11.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.9% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.2% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.1% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Brazilians by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Central American (10.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Ghanaian (10.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Barbados (10.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Uruguay (10.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from South Africa (10.8%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Immigrants from Latvia (10.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Philippines (10.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Macedonian (11.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Ukraine (10.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (10.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 93.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Ghanaians | 93.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Central Americans | 92.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 92.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 91.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Eastern Europeans | 90.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 90.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Armenians | 90.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 89.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.2 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 88.4 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.9% |
| South American Indians | 88.1 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 88.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 86.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.8 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 85.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 85.4 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Brazilians | 85.4 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Macedonians | 84.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.0% |