Immigrants vs Immigrants from Ghana Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants
Immigrants from Ghana
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Immigrants
Immigrants from Ghana
2.5%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
15.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.5%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
14.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
199th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants vs Immigrants from Ghana Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 575,126,463 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.247 and weighted average of 2.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,790,257 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.130 and weighted average of 2.5%, a difference of 0.020%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants | Immigrants from Ghana |
| Minimum | 0.58% | 0.40% |
| Maximum | 25.8% | 5.4% |
| Range | 25.3% | 5.0% |
| Mean | 2.8% | 2.5% |
| Median | 2.5% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.37% | 0.96% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.1% | 0.94% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 0.94% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants and Immigrants from Ghana by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Crow (2.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Korean (2.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (2.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Western Africa (2.5%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (2.5%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ghana are Crow (2.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Korean (2.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (2.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Western Africa (2.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (2.5%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 28.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 28.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 2.5% |
| Sioux | 24.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 2.5% |
| Moroccans | 22.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 2.5% |
| Soviet Union | 22.2 /100 | #192 | Fair 2.5% |
| Ukrainians | 21.4 /100 | #193 | Fair 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 17.9 /100 | #194 | Poor 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 15.6 /100 | #195 | Poor 2.5% |
| Koreans | 15.5 /100 | #196 | Poor 2.5% |
| Crow | 15.2 /100 | #197 | Poor 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 15.0 /100 | #198 | Poor 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 14.7 /100 | #199 | Poor 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 13.3 /100 | #200 | Poor 2.5% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 12.9 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.5% |
| Slovaks | 12.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 12.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 11.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 2.5% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 11.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 2.5% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 10.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 2.5% |
| French | 9.9 /100 | #207 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Central Americans | 8.7 /100 | #208 | Tragic 2.5% |