Indian (Asian) vs Asian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Indian (Asian)
Asian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Indians (Asian)
Asians
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indian (Asian) vs Asian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 495,002,853 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.337 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 550,442,799 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Asians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.181 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 0.80%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Indian (Asian) | Asian |
Minimum | 0.51% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 12.9% | 9.5% |
Range | 12.4% | 7.7% |
Mean | 5.2% | 5.1% |
Median | 5.1% | 5.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 4.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.6% | 5.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 1.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 1.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 1.2% |
Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) and Asians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Ethiopian (5.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Kuwait (5.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Asians are Cambodian (5.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Nepal (5.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Iran (5.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Zimbabwean (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.4%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 5.5% |