Jamaican vs Nicaraguan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Jamaican
Nicaraguan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Jamaicans
Nicaraguans
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
69th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jamaican vs Nicaraguan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,784,846 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.342 and weighted average of 2.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,654,753 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.150 and weighted average of 2.7%, a difference of 2.0%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jamaican | Nicaraguan |
Minimum | 0.58% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 5.6% | 8.8% |
Range | 5.0% | 7.6% |
Mean | 2.5% | 2.8% |
Median | 2.5% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 2.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.0% | 2.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 0.81% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.80% | 1.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.80% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Jamaicans and Nicaraguans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Jamaicans are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (2.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Ethiopian (2.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (2.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (2.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and South American (2.7%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nicaraguans are Immigrants from Africa (2.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Egyptian (2.7%, a difference of 0.17%), Peruvian (2.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Belize (2.7%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Nepal (2.7%, a difference of 0.52%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Paraguayans | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.2 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Jamaicans | 99.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Ethiopians | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.7% |
South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 98.6 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 98.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 98.4 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 98.4 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Indians (Asian) | 98.4 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.4 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Belize | 98.2 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Egyptians | 98.1 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Africa | 98.0 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Nicaraguans | 97.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Peruvians | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 2.7% |