New Zealander vs Subsaharan African Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
New Zealander
Subsaharan African
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
New Zealanders
Sub-Saharan Africans
17.4%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
21.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.5%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
New Zealander vs Subsaharan African Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,922,503 people shows no correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.023 and weighted average of 17.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,099,215 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.038 and weighted average of 18.5%, a difference of 6.2%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | New Zealander | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 3.1% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 37.6% | 40.3% |
Range | 34.5% | 38.0% |
Mean | 15.6% | 18.5% |
Median | 15.4% | 18.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.1% | 16.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.2% | 19.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.2% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (17.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Guyanese (17.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Delaware (17.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (17.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Haiti (17.4%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Immigrants | France | 29.8 /100 | #188 | Fair 17.4% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 29.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 17.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 27.7 /100 | #190 | Fair 17.4% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 27.4 /100 | #191 | Fair 17.4% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 27.1 /100 | #192 | Fair 17.4% |
Delaware | 25.6 /100 | #193 | Fair 17.4% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 22.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 17.4% |
New Zealanders | 21.1 /100 | #195 | Fair 17.4% |
Guyanese | 17.5 /100 | #196 | Poor 17.5% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 16.7 /100 | #197 | Poor 17.5% |
Immigrants | Panama | 14.8 /100 | #198 | Poor 17.5% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 14.3 /100 | #199 | Poor 17.5% |
Haitians | 14.1 /100 | #200 | Poor 17.5% |
South American Indians | 13.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 17.5% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 12.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 17.5% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Yaqui (18.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Chickasaw (18.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Dominica (18.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (18.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and Liberian (18.6%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 18.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.4% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.4% |
Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.5% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 18.6% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 18.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 18.6% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 18.6% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 18.6% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 18.6% |