Okinawan vs Indian (Asian) Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Okinawan
Indian (Asian)
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Okinawans
Indians (Asian)
5.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Okinawan vs Indian (Asian) Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,734,691 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Okinawans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.243 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 495,002,853 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.337 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 2.0%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Okinawan | Indian (Asian) |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 0.51% |
| Maximum | 10.6% | 12.9% |
| Range | 8.7% | 12.4% |
| Mean | 4.9% | 5.2% |
| Median | 4.8% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.7% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.8% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.8% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Okinawans and Indians (Asian) by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Okinawans are Immigrants from Korea (5.2%, a difference of 0.31%), Burmese (5.3%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.3%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from China (5.3%, a difference of 0.98%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Ethiopian (5.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Kuwait (5.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |