Palestinian vs Chinese Vision Disability
COMPARE
Palestinian
Chinese
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Palestinians
Chinese
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
98.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Palestinian vs Chinese Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,427,848 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.015 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,795,588 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.356 and weighted average of 2.0%, a difference of 0.87%.

Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Palestinian | Chinese |
Minimum | 0.30% | 0.40% |
Maximum | 6.4% | 6.4% |
Range | 6.1% | 6.0% |
Mean | 2.0% | 2.3% |
Median | 1.9% | 2.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 1.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.3% | 2.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.81% | 0.78% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.1% | 1.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.1% | 1.00% |
Demographics Similar to Palestinians and Chinese by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Immigrants from North Macedonia (2.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Paraguayan (2.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Jordan (2.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eritrea (2.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (2.0%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Moldova (2.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Latvia (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Switzerland (2.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Norwegian (2.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (2.0%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Russians | 98.6 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 98.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | France | 98.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Palestinians | 98.3 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Paraguayans | 98.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 98.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 98.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 98.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Lithuanians | 97.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Soviet Union | 97.6 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Poland | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 97.5 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Chinese | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 97.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Norwegians | 97.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 97.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.0% |