Panamanian vs Immigrants from Fiji Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Panamanian
Immigrants from Fiji
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Panamanians
Immigrants from Fiji
3.0%
HEARING DISABILITY
47.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
176th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
67.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Panamanian vs Immigrants from Fiji Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 281,114,071 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Panamanians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.768 and weighted average of 3.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,738,910 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.381 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 2.0%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Panamanian | Immigrants from Fiji |
| Minimum | 0.76% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 35.6% | 3.9% |
| Range | 34.9% | 2.5% |
| Mean | 6.2% | 2.9% |
| Median | 4.0% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.6% | 3.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 0.61% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 0.54% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 0.53% |
Demographics Similar to Panamanians and Immigrants from Fiji by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Panamanians are Immigrants from Philippines (3.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Japanese (3.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Romania (3.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Indonesian (3.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Serbia (3.0%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Fiji are Immigrants from Australia (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Albanian (2.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Japan (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Central America (3.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Cambodia (3.0%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
| Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 64.9 /100 | #163 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 64.8 /100 | #164 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 64.2 /100 | #165 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 62.9 /100 | #166 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #167 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 57.9 /100 | #168 | Average 3.0% |
| Arabs | 57.6 /100 | #169 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 56.9 /100 | #170 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 56.6 /100 | #171 | Average 3.0% |
| Armenians | 56.0 /100 | #172 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 51.1 /100 | #173 | Average 3.0% |
| Indonesians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 48.4 /100 | #175 | Average 3.0% |
| Panamanians | 47.0 /100 | #176 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 46.4 /100 | #177 | Average 3.0% |
| Japanese | 46.0 /100 | #178 | Average 3.0% |