Polish vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Polish
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Poles
Immigrants from Bangladesh
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
26.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
197th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
24.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Polish vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 560,051,234 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.570 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,637,177 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.046 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 0.12%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Polish | Immigrants from Bangladesh |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 0.46% |
| Maximum | 47.7% | 15.9% |
| Range | 45.5% | 15.4% |
| Mean | 9.1% | 6.1% |
| Median | 6.6% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.8% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Poles and Immigrants from Bangladesh by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Malaysian (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Belgian (6.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Alaska Native (6.2%, a difference of 0.23%), Guatemalan (6.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and Italian (6.2%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh are Italian (6.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Cambodia (6.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Malaysian (6.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Belgian (6.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Central America (6.2%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |
| British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |
| Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
| Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
| Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
| Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
| Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
| Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
| Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
| Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
| Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
| Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |