Samoan vs Italian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Samoan
Italian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Samoans
Italians
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
12.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
22.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
199th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Samoan vs Italian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,059,815 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Samoans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.004 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 574,457,060 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Italians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 0.99%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Samoan | Italian |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 18.6% | 31.5% |
| Range | 17.1% | 29.8% |
| Mean | 7.0% | 6.7% |
| Median | 6.3% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Samoans and Italians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Japanese (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Laos (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Italians are Immigrants from Cambodia (6.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (6.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Central America (6.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Albanian (6.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and Polish (6.2%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
| Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
| Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
| Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
| Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
| Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
| Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
| Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
| Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
| Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |