Samoan vs South American Indian Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Samoan
South American Indian
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Samoans
South American Indians
12.1%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
2.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
242nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
83.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Samoan vs South American Indian Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,063,493 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Samoans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.023 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,539,388 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 10.7%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Samoan | South American Indian |
Minimum | 2.4% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 33.9% | 33.4% |
Range | 31.4% | 31.7% |
Mean | 13.1% | 13.4% |
Median | 12.0% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.9% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.6% | 19.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 9.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 6.8% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Samoans by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Slovak (12.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Mexican American Indian (12.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Western Africa (12.0%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Thailand (12.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and Finnish (12.1%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Belizeans | 4.5 /100 | #235 | Tragic 12.0% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 4.5 /100 | #236 | Tragic 12.0% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.9 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.0% |
West Indians | 3.7 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.0% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 3.3 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.0% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 3.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.0% |
Mexican American Indians | 3.2 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.0% |
Samoans | 2.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.1% |
Slovaks | 2.7 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.1% |
Finns | 2.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.1% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 2.2 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.1% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 1.4 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 1.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.2% |
Spaniards | 1.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.3% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 1.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.3% |
Demographics Similar to South American Indians by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Immigrants from Eritrea (10.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Arab (10.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (10.9%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Cameroon (10.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and Syrian (11.0%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Costa Ricans | 91.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 91.3 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Australians | 90.7 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 90.6 /100 | #142 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Sierra Leoneans | 89.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 10.8% |
Lithuanians | 88.7 /100 | #144 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 85.6 /100 | #145 | Excellent 10.9% |
South American Indians | 83.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 83.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 10.9% |
Arabs | 82.7 /100 | #148 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 81.1 /100 | #149 | Excellent 10.9% |
Syrians | 79.8 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
New Zealanders | 79.3 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
Ukrainians | 78.0 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | England | 77.4 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |