Scottish vs Immigrants from Oceania Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Scottish
Immigrants from Oceania
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Scottish
Immigrants from Oceania
6.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
253rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
60.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scottish vs Immigrants from Oceania Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 566,616,487 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.557 and weighted average of 6.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,408,228 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.348 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 7.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Scottish | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 3.1% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 62.5% | 20.2% |
| Range | 59.4% | 18.6% |
| Mean | 13.4% | 8.5% |
| Median | 9.4% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.3% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.4% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.4% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.4% | 4.2% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Scottish by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Immigrants from Bahamas (6.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Belizean (6.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Welsh (6.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Hawaiian (6.5%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Uzbekistan (6.5%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Armenians | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Chinese | 1.0 /100 | #250 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Hawaiians | 0.9 /100 | #251 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.8 /100 | #252 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Scottish | 0.7 /100 | #253 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Belizeans | 0.7 /100 | #254 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Welsh | 0.6 /100 | #255 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.6 /100 | #256 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Bermudans | 0.5 /100 | #257 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.5 /100 | #258 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Aleuts | 0.4 /100 | #259 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.4 /100 | #260 | Tragic 6.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Ecuadorian (6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Iraqi (6.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Nicaraguan (6.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (6.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Basque (6.1%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
| Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
| Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
| Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
| Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
| Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |
| Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 6.1% |
| Moroccans | 52.6 /100 | #171 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172 | Average 6.1% |
| Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 6.1% |