Sioux vs French Canadian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Sioux
French Canadian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Sioux
French Canadians
6.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
274th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sioux vs French Canadian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 234,119,186 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.076 and weighted average of 6.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 502,380,239 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of French Canadians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.520 and weighted average of 6.7%, a difference of 0.26%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sioux | French Canadian |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 15.2% | 32.4% |
| Range | 13.7% | 30.5% |
| Mean | 7.3% | 9.0% |
| Median | 7.0% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.4% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Sioux and French Canadians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sioux are Immigrants from Guyana (6.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Celtic (6.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Jamaican (6.7%, a difference of 0.17%), White/Caucasian (6.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from West Indies (6.7%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to French Canadians are White/Caucasian (6.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Guyana (6.7%, a difference of 0.32%), Celtic (6.7%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (6.7%, a difference of 0.36%), and Jamaican (6.7%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Hmong | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Nepalese | 0.2 /100 | #264 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Spanish | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 6.6% |
| French | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Slovaks | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 6.7% |
| French Canadians | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Sioux | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Celtics | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.8% |