Sri Lankan vs Choctaw Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Sri Lankan
Choctaw
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Sri Lankans
Choctaw
17.1%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
78.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.4%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
310th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sri Lankan vs Choctaw Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,507,273 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.015 and weighted average of 17.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,665,834 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.196 and weighted average of 18.4%, a difference of 7.7%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sri Lankan | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 5.5% | 9.7% |
| Maximum | 32.6% | 32.3% |
| Range | 27.2% | 22.6% |
| Mean | 16.8% | 19.6% |
| Median | 16.6% | 19.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.5% | 17.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.8% | 21.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 3.5% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Brazilian (17.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Malaysia (17.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (17.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Australia (17.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (17.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Cypriots | 85.7 /100 | #149 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Basques | 85.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Syrians | 83.0 /100 | #151 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 82.7 /100 | #152 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.5 /100 | #153 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 79.3 /100 | #154 | Good 17.1% |
| Brazilians | 78.9 /100 | #155 | Good 17.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 78.9 /100 | #156 | Good 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 17.1% |
| Celtics | 74.1 /100 | #158 | Good 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 73.2 /100 | #159 | Good 17.2% |
| Australians | 72.4 /100 | #160 | Good 17.2% |
| Americans | 72.2 /100 | #161 | Good 17.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 71.6 /100 | #162 | Good 17.2% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 71.5 /100 | #163 | Good 17.2% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Hmong (18.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Chickasaw (18.5%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (18.4%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Western Africa (18.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and Yaqui (18.5%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 18.6% |