Sudanese vs Celtic Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Sudanese
Celtic
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Sudanese
Celtics
18.9%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
334th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.1%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
74.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sudanese vs Celtic Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,121,585 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.083 and weighted average of 18.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,858,493 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 17.1%, a difference of 10.1%.

Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sudanese | Celtic |
Minimum | 7.8% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 27.0% | 50.0% |
Range | 19.2% | 48.7% |
Mean | 18.3% | 16.4% |
Median | 18.4% | 15.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.1% | 13.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.7% | 18.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 6.3% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Sudanese by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Yemen (18.8%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Sudan (18.8%, a difference of 0.44%), Pima (18.8%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (18.8%, a difference of 0.52%), and Senegalese (19.0%, a difference of 0.54%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.7% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 18.8% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 18.8% |
Sudanese | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 18.9% |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 19.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 19.0% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 19.1% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 19.1% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 19.2% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 19.2% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 19.3% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Latvia (17.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Australian (17.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Australia (17.1%, a difference of 0.070%), American (17.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and Yugoslavian (17.2%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Syrians | 83.0 /100 | #151 | Excellent 17.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 82.7 /100 | #152 | Excellent 17.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.5 /100 | #153 | Excellent 17.1% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 79.3 /100 | #154 | Good 17.1% |
Brazilians | 78.9 /100 | #155 | Good 17.1% |
Sri Lankans | 78.9 /100 | #156 | Good 17.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 17.1% |
Celtics | 74.1 /100 | #158 | Good 17.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 73.2 /100 | #159 | Good 17.2% |
Australians | 72.4 /100 | #160 | Good 17.2% |
Americans | 72.2 /100 | #161 | Good 17.2% |
Yugoslavians | 71.6 /100 | #162 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 71.5 /100 | #163 | Good 17.2% |
Armenians | 70.1 /100 | #164 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Albania | 64.9 /100 | #165 | Good 17.2% |