Swedish vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Swedish
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Swedes
Immigrants from Middle Africa
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
64th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
77th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swedish vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 537,435,418 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.585 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,614,589 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.174 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 0.54%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Swedish | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
Minimum | 0.30% | 0.061% |
Maximum | 32.6% | 6.9% |
Range | 32.3% | 6.8% |
Mean | 4.8% | 2.4% |
Median | 2.5% | 2.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 1.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.9% | 2.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 0.73% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 1.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.2% | 1.1% |
Demographics Similar to Swedes and Immigrants from Middle Africa by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Swedes are Mongolian (2.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Brazilian (2.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Egyptian (2.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Argentina (2.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and South African (2.3%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Immigrants from Ireland (2.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Kenya (2.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from China (2.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Netherlands (2.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (2.3%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Palestinians | 99.4 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Egyptians | 99.4 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Mongolians | 99.3 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Swedes | 99.3 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Brazilians | 99.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.3 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 2.3% |
South Africans | 99.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 99.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Norway | 99.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.2 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Asians | 99.2 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.1 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.1 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.1 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | China | 99.1 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 99.0 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.0 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 99.0 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Chileans | 98.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 2.3% |