Turkish vs Immigrants from China Female Disability
COMPARE
Turkish
Immigrants from China
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Turks
Immigrants from China
11.1%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Immigrants from China Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,848,470 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.338 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 457,020,371 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.108 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 3.8%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Immigrants from China |
| Minimum | 3.8% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 25.3% | 17.5% |
| Range | 21.5% | 15.9% |
| Mean | 12.0% | 9.6% |
| Median | 10.7% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.8% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Immigrants from China by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Malaysia (11.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Egyptian (11.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kuwait (11.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Australia (11.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Turkey (11.1%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (10.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Israel (10.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Burmese (10.7%, a difference of 0.51%), Okinawan (10.8%, a difference of 0.58%), and Indian (Asian) (10.8%, a difference of 0.90%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Venezuelans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Argentineans | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Egyptians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.1% |