Ugandan vs Chickasaw Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Ugandan
Chickasaw
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Ugandans
Chickasaw
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
81st/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs Chickasaw Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,977,399 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.114 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,605,375 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.058 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 22.3%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ugandan | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.57% | 0.38% |
| Maximum | 4.1% | 11.8% |
| Range | 3.5% | 11.4% |
| Mean | 2.2% | 3.9% |
| Median | 2.2% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.6% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 2.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.82% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.81% | 1.9% |
Similar Demographics by Self-Care Disability
Demographics Similar to Ugandans by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from Denmark (2.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Chilean (2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Indian (Asian) (2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Spain (2.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (2.3%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.1 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.1 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.1 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 99.0 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.0 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 99.0 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Chileans | 98.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Ugandans | 98.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Indians (Asian) | 98.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 98.7 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 98.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Lithuanians | 98.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Navajo (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Spanish American Indian (2.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (2.8%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Dominica (2.8%, a difference of 0.38%), and Comanche (2.9%, a difference of 0.47%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 2.9% |