Ugandan vs Immigrants from South Africa Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Ugandan
Immigrants from South Africa
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Ugandans
Immigrants from South Africa
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
75th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs Immigrants from South Africa Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,018,396 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.026 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,268,950 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.763 and weighted average of 5.7%, a difference of 0.38%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ugandan | Immigrants from South Africa |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 0.47% |
| Maximum | 14.2% | 27.3% |
| Range | 12.8% | 26.8% |
| Mean | 5.7% | 7.8% |
| Median | 5.5% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.1% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans and Immigrants from South Africa by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Eastern European (5.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Palestinian (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ireland (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and Chilean (5.7%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Sudanese (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Cameroon (5.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (5.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Brazilian (5.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Peru (5.7%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Peruvians | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Brazilians | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sudanese | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |