West Indian vs Chickasaw Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
West Indian
Chickasaw
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
West Indians
Chickasaw
12.0%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
3.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
238th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
West Indian vs Chickasaw Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,855,043 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of West Indians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.128 and weighted average of 12.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,666,878 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.318 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 34.2%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | West Indian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 4.3% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 25.3% | 51.4% |
| Range | 21.0% | 49.5% |
| Mean | 12.2% | 23.7% |
| Median | 12.1% | 21.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 18.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.1% | 27.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 9.0% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to West Indians by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to West Indians are Immigrants from Cambodia (12.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Western Africa (12.0%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Thailand (12.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Mexican American Indian (12.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (12.0%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Jamaicans | 5.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Sudanese | 5.3 /100 | #232 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Bermudans | 5.0 /100 | #233 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Portuguese | 4.9 /100 | #234 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Belizeans | 4.5 /100 | #235 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 4.5 /100 | #236 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.9 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.0% |
| West Indians | 3.7 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 3.3 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 3.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Mexican American Indians | 3.2 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Samoans | 2.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Slovaks | 2.7 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Finns | 2.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 2.2 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Pima (16.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Puerto Rican (15.9%, a difference of 1.0%), Menominee (15.9%, a difference of 1.4%), Seminole (15.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and Colville (15.8%, a difference of 1.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |