Yugoslavian vs Immigrants from Oceania Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
Immigrants from Oceania
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Yugoslavians
Immigrants from Oceania
3.3%
HEARING DISABILITY
1.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
242nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
6.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
222nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yugoslavian vs Immigrants from Oceania Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,663,811 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.454 and weighted average of 3.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,402,457 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.372 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 4.2%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yugoslavian | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 1.3% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 15.8% | 7.9% |
Range | 14.5% | 6.5% |
Mean | 4.5% | 4.0% |
Median | 3.6% | 3.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 3.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.6% | 4.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 1.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.7% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.7% | 1.6% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians and Immigrants from Oceania by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Samoan (3.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Netherlands (3.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Nepalese (3.3%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Austria (3.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and German Russian (3.3%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Mexican (3.2%, a difference of 0.36%), Icelander (3.2%, a difference of 0.53%), Latvian (3.2%, a difference of 0.57%), Lebanese (3.2%, a difference of 0.62%), and Bhutanese (3.2%, a difference of 0.80%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% |
Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.2% |
Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 3.2% |
Latvians | 5.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 3.2% |
Lebanese | 5.0 /100 | #226 | Tragic 3.2% |
Bhutanese | 4.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 4.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 3.2% |
Maltese | 4.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 3.2% |
Greeks | 3.2 /100 | #230 | Tragic 3.2% |
Luxembourgers | 2.9 /100 | #231 | Tragic 3.2% |
Ukrainians | 2.9 /100 | #232 | Tragic 3.2% |
Estonians | 2.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 3.3% |
Central American Indians | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 3.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 3.3% |
Serbians | 2.2 /100 | #236 | Tragic 3.3% |
Immigrants | Austria | 1.8 /100 | #237 | Tragic 3.3% |
German Russians | 1.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 3.3% |
Nepalese | 1.2 /100 | #239 | Tragic 3.3% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 1.1 /100 | #240 | Tragic 3.3% |
Samoans | 1.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 3.3% |
Yugoslavians | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 3.3% |