Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Brazil Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Immigrants from Brazil
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Zimbabweans
Immigrants from Brazil
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
89.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
118th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Brazil Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,200,821 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.035 and weighted average of 2.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 342,924,003 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.135 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 1.2%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from Brazil |
| Minimum | 0.53% | 0.070% |
| Maximum | 6.9% | 9.7% |
| Range | 6.4% | 9.7% |
| Mean | 3.0% | 3.1% |
| Median | 2.9% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 0.99% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Immigrants from Brazil by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Liberia (2.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Kenyan (2.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Jordanian (2.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Cuban (2.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and Liberian (2.8%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Brazil are Soviet Union (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Ugandan (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Chilean (2.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Syria (2.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
| South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |