Zimbabwean vs Indian (Asian) Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Indian (Asian)
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Zimbabweans
Indians (Asian)
2.2%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
83rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Indian (Asian) Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,189,225 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.689 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 494,223,906 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.392 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 8.8%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Indian (Asian) |
Minimum | 0.34% | 0.22% |
Maximum | 12.0% | 7.5% |
Range | 11.7% | 7.3% |
Mean | 2.4% | 2.4% |
Median | 2.0% | 2.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 2.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 2.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.0% | 0.76% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 0.78% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 0.77% |
Similar Demographics by Self-Care Disability
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Filipino (2.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Bolivia (2.2%, a difference of 0.46%), Bolivian (2.2%, a difference of 0.51%), Immigrants from Nepal (2.2%, a difference of 0.64%), and Immigrants from Singapore (2.1%, a difference of 0.98%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Sudanese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Immigrants from Spain (2.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Ugandan (2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Denmark (2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Chilean (2.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (2.3%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
Immigrants | China | 99.1 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 99.0 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.0 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 99.0 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Chileans | 98.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Ugandans | 98.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 98.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Spain | 98.7 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Sierra Leoneans | 98.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Lithuanians | 98.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 98.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.4% |