Celtic Female Disability

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,857,089 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.085 and weighted average of 13.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.17% in percentage of females with a disability.

It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Celtics and percentage of females with a disability does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Celtics influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of females with a disability within an area, or if Celtics simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of females with a disability due to other factors.

Demographics Similar to Celtics by Female Disability

In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Marshallese (13.3%, a difference of 0.050%), French (13.3%, a difference of 0.21%), Yakama (13.2%, a difference of 0.31%), Nepalese (13.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and Slovak (13.3%, a difference of 0.38%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Disability
Yaqui	0.0 /100 \| #287	Tragic 13.2%
Whites/Caucasians	0.0 /100 \| #288	Tragic 13.2%
Tlingit-Haida	0.0 /100 \| #289	Tragic 13.2%
Immigrants from Yemen	0.0 /100 \| #290	Tragic 13.2%
Shoshone	0.0 /100 \| #291	Tragic 13.2%
Yakama	0.0 /100 \| #292	Tragic 13.2%
Marshallese	0.0 /100 \| #293	Tragic 13.3%
Celtics	0.0 /100 \| #294	Tragic 13.3%
French	0.0 /100 \| #295	Tragic 13.3%
Nepalese	0.0 /100 \| #296	Tragic 13.3%
Slovaks	0.0 /100 \| #297	Tragic 13.3%
Nonimmigrants	0.0 /100 \| #298	Tragic 13.4%
Immigrants from Dominican Republic	0.0 /100 \| #299	Tragic 13.4%
Pennsylvania Germans	0.0 /100 \| #300	Tragic 13.4%
Africans	0.0 /100 \| #301	Tragic 13.4%

Celtic Female Disability Correlation Summary

Measurement	Celtic Data	Female Disability Data
Minimum	0.018%	4.6%
Maximum	25.6%	42.6%
Range	25.5%	38.0%
Mean	3.0%	16.5%
Median	2.2%	14.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	1.1%	12.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	3.9%	18.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.8%	6.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	3.4%	6.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	3.4%	6.7%

Correlation Details

Celtic Percentile	Sample Size	Female Disability
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.018%	128,364,253	12.4%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.071%	22,462,117	12.7%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.12%	8,185,215	12.9%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18%	3,387,918	13.5%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.23%	2,195,396	13.3%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.28%	1,329,627	12.7%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33%	584,043	13.6%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39%	409,327	13.3%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.44%	182,804	13.8%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.49%	260,088	13.9%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.54%	206,059	14.3%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.59%	129,384	14.4%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65%	223,409	13.6%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70%	98,343	14.5%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73%	116,482	12.8%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.79%	203,109	14.1%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.85%	41,516	16.5%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89%	23,937	15.5%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.94%	71,295	15.0%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.01%	25,649	14.7%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.06%	11,145	21.8%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.11%	32,648	12.2%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.15%	37,009	20.6%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20%	9,327	18.6%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.25%	18,058	19.7%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.31%	8,519	18.9%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.38%	4,428	24.3%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.42%	3,720	16.5%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.44%	12,132	22.9%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.51%	21,586	12.7%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.57%	24,834	12.0%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61%	12,553	16.8%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.71%	24,800	14.4%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.77%	9,115	23.7%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.82%	10,525	12.7%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.85%	4,046	22.4%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93%	2,119	18.7%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.96%	3,766	16.4%
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.02%	7,741	10.2%
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.10%	5,964	19.3%
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.18%	12,524	13.7%
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.22%	856	12.0%
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28%	1,054	14.6%
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.34%	128	27.5%
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.41%	16,879	18.4%
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.44%	4,597	25.2%
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.47%	364	4.6%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.54%	5,560	18.8%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.57%	2,486	23.4%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.62%	3,854	11.0%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.69%	781	23.5%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.82%	71	10.5%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.86%	4,930	18.7%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.92%	3,018	11.8%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.95%	1,220	17.9%
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.00%	1,700	9.0%
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.04%	988	41.6%
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.16%	729	42.6%
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.27%	1,468	16.5%
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.29%	2,702	21.0%
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.60%	2,863	15.2%
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.85%	52	6.2%
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.88%	103	9.8%
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.97%	604	10.3%
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.01%	424	14.9%
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.18%	1,077	12.1%
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.22%	2,298	12.2%
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35%	138	14.9%
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.60%	7,087	14.8%
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.82%	1,059	14.8%
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.87%	1,457	7.4%
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.94%	81	9.8%
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.26%	38	8.3%
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.37%	428	33.2%
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.57%	3,179	16.4%
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.46%	681	17.0%
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.74%	89	9.7%
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.14%	2,679	16.7%
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.17%	1,396	22.3%
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.44%	308	23.9%
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.81%	295	25.9%
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.52%	21	10.0%
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.26%	234	34.1%
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.56%	583	13.3%

Celtic Female Disability

COMPARE

Celtic Female DisabilityTragic

Celtic Female Disability Correlation Chart

Demographics Similar to Celtics by Female Disability

Celtic Female Disability Correlation Summary

Correlation Details

Celtic Female Disability
Tragic