Afghan vs Chickasaw Average Family Size
COMPARE
Afghan
Chickasaw
Average Family Size
Average Family Size Comparison
Afghans
Chickasaw
3.31
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.19
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
6.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Afghan vs Chickasaw Average Family Size Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,832,546 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Afghans and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.279 and weighted average of 3.31. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,515 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.131 and weighted average of 3.19, a difference of 4.0%.
Average Family Size Correlation Summary
Measurement | Afghan | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 2.51 | 2.14 |
Maximum | 4.04 | 4.35 |
Range | 1.53 | 2.21 |
Mean | 3.30 | 3.19 |
Median | 3.29 | 3.16 |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.22 | 3.04 |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.46 | 3.32 |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.23 | 0.28 |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.26 | 0.38 |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.26 | 0.37 |
Similar Demographics by Average Family Size
Demographics Similar to Afghans by Average Family Size
In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Jamaican (3.31, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (3.32, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Peru (3.31, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (3.32, a difference of 0.080%), and Ecuadorian (3.32, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Average Family Size |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 99.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 3.32 |
British West Indians | 99.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Lumbee | 99.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Immigrants | Dominica | 99.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Ecuadorians | 99.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.8 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 99.7 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Afghans | 99.7 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 3.31 |
Jamaicans | 99.7 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 3.31 |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.7 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 3.31 |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.6 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 3.31 |
Malaysians | 99.6 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 3.31 |
Menominee | 99.4 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 3.30 |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 3.30 |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.2 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 3.30 |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Average Family Size
In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Portuguese (3.19, a difference of 0.0%), Cree (3.19, a difference of 0.020%), Nonimmigrants (3.19, a difference of 0.030%), Syrian (3.19, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Italy (3.19, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Average Family Size |
Pennsylvania Germans | 9.3 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.19 |
Lebanese | 9.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.19 |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 7.2 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.19 |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 7.2 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.19 |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 7.1 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.19 |
Syrians | 6.5 /100 | #224 | Tragic 3.19 |
Cree | 6.2 /100 | #225 | Tragic 3.19 |
Chickasaw | 6.0 /100 | #226 | Tragic 3.19 |
Portuguese | 6.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 3.19 |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 5.7 /100 | #228 | Tragic 3.19 |
Immigrants | Italy | 5.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 3.19 |
Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #230 | Tragic 3.19 |
Basques | 5.2 /100 | #231 | Tragic 3.19 |
Cherokee | 4.7 /100 | #232 | Tragic 3.18 |
Brazilians | 4.5 /100 | #233 | Tragic 3.18 |