Alaskan Athabascan vs Choctaw Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Choctaw
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Choctaw
37.7%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
289th/ 347
METRIC RANK
36.9%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Choctaw Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,775,598 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.649 and weighted average of 37.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 258,635,203 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.484 and weighted average of 36.9%, a difference of 2.3%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 12.2% | 9.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 87.8% | 90.9% |
| Mean | 64.8% | 53.2% |
| Median | 63.4% | 46.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 36.2% | 36.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 100.0% | 63.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 63.8% | 26.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 32.5% | 22.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 32.1% | 22.2% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans and Choctaw by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Hispanic or Latino (37.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Liberia (37.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Creek (37.6%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Guatemala (37.5%, a difference of 0.63%), and Immigrants from Mexico (37.5%, a difference of 0.65%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Mexican (36.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Cree (37.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Barbados (36.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Barbadian (37.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Congo (36.8%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 36.8% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 36.8% |
| Choctaw | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 36.9% |
| Mexicans | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 36.9% |
| Cree | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 37.0% |
| Barbadians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 37.0% |
| Belizeans | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 37.0% |
| Guatemalans | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 37.1% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 37.1% |
| West Indians | 0.1 /100 | #279 | Tragic 37.3% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.1 /100 | #280 | Tragic 37.3% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.1 /100 | #281 | Tragic 37.3% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 37.4% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 37.4% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 37.4% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 37.5% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 37.5% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 37.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 37.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 37.7% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 37.8% |