American vs Malaysian Family Households
COMPARE
American
Malaysian
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Americans
Malaysians
65.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
69th/ 347
METRIC RANK
American vs Malaysian Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 581,387,036 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Americans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.291 and weighted average of 65.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,012,303 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001 and weighted average of 65.9%, a difference of 0.56%.

Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | American | Malaysian |
Minimum | 43.9% | 27.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 93.6% |
Range | 56.1% | 65.8% |
Mean | 68.2% | 66.8% |
Median | 66.7% | 65.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 65.1% | 62.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 69.3% | 71.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 9.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 10.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 10.3% |
Demographics Similar to Americans and Malaysians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Americans are Immigrants from Guyana (65.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Lebanon (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Jordanian (65.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Cambodia (65.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and Puget Sound Salish (65.6%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Immigrants from Afghanistan (65.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Bhutanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 99.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Yaqui | 99.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 99.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Puget Sound Salish | 99.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Jordanians | 99.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.7 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 99.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Americans | 99.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 99.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 65.4% |
Egyptians | 99.4 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 65.4% |