Chickasaw vs Yuman Currently Married
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Yuman
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Chickasaw
Yuman
46.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
47.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
42.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
293rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Yuman Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,723,431 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194 and weighted average of 46.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,696,202 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Yuman and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.557 and weighted average of 42.6%, a difference of 9.5%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Yuman |
| Minimum | 27.5% | 6.1% |
| Maximum | 68.4% | 59.4% |
| Range | 40.9% | 53.3% |
| Mean | 48.9% | 42.2% |
| Median | 49.7% | 45.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 45.0% | 31.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 54.2% | 52.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.2% | 21.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 12.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 12.5% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Brazil (46.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Peruvian (46.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and Tlingit-Haida (46.7%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 52.4 /100 | #171 | Average 46.7% |
| Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
| Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
| Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
| Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
| Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
| Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
| Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
| Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
| Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
| Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |
Demographics Similar to Yuman by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Yuman are Subsaharan African (42.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Honduran (42.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Guatemala (42.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Ghana (42.7%, a difference of 0.29%), and Paiute (42.7%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.8% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.7% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.7% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.5% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.4% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 42.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 42.2% |