Choctaw vs Immigrants from Oceania Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Choctaw
Immigrants from Oceania
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Choctaw
Immigrants from Oceania
46.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
24.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
191st/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
74.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Oceania Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,626,199 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.202 and weighted average of 46.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,387,032 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.425 and weighted average of 46.9%, a difference of 2.1%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Choctaw | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 19.5% | 8.8% |
Maximum | 64.6% | 84.0% |
Range | 45.1% | 75.2% |
Mean | 45.2% | 45.7% |
Median | 45.9% | 47.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 42.3% | 41.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 49.4% | 51.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.1% | 9.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.6% | 13.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 13.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Immigrants from Northern Africa (46.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Kuwait (46.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Taiwanese (45.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Mexican American Indian (45.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Latvia (46.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 36.9 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.2% |
Brazilians | 35.9 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.2% |
Albanians | 31.1 /100 | #186 | Fair 46.1% |
Fijians | 29.2 /100 | #187 | Fair 46.1% |
South American Indians | 28.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 26.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 25.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 46.0% |
Choctaw | 24.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 24.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 46.0% |
Taiwanese | 23.4 /100 | #193 | Fair 45.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 23.3 /100 | #194 | Fair 45.9% |
Chickasaw | 22.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 45.9% |
Immigrants | South America | 22.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 45.9% |
Cambodians | 21.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 45.9% |
Ottawa | 19.4 /100 | #198 | Poor 45.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Armenian (46.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Asia (46.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Arab (46.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Hmong (47.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Serbian (47.0%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.6 /100 | #150 | Good 47.0% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 76.8 /100 | #151 | Good 47.0% |
Serbians | 76.3 /100 | #152 | Good 47.0% |
Hmong | 76.2 /100 | #153 | Good 47.0% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 76.1 /100 | #154 | Good 46.9% |
Arabs | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 46.9% |
Armenians | 75.4 /100 | #156 | Good 46.9% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 74.8 /100 | #157 | Good 46.9% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 73.3 /100 | #158 | Good 46.9% |
Osage | 73.2 /100 | #159 | Good 46.9% |
Iraqis | 71.7 /100 | #160 | Good 46.9% |
Delaware | 71.2 /100 | #161 | Good 46.8% |
Colombians | 71.0 /100 | #162 | Good 46.8% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 70.2 /100 | #163 | Good 46.8% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 70.0 /100 | #164 | Good 46.8% |