Croatian vs Native/Alaskan Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Croatian
Native/Alaskan
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Croatians
Natives/Alaskans
48.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
60th/ 347
METRIC RANK
43.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
267th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Croatian vs Native/Alaskan Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 375,518,925 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Croatians and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.000 and weighted average of 48.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,631,690 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.628 and weighted average of 43.5%, a difference of 11.6%.

Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Croatian | Native/Alaskan |
Minimum | 18.1% | 13.8% |
Maximum | 84.8% | 55.8% |
Range | 66.7% | 42.1% |
Mean | 49.2% | 39.8% |
Median | 50.4% | 41.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 44.2% | 34.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 54.8% | 45.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.6% | 11.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.1% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.0% | 7.9% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Croatians by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Bulgarian (48.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Luxembourger (48.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Polish (48.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Indonesia (48.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and Czechoslovakian (48.5%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Whites/Caucasians | 99.3 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 48.6% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.3 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 48.6% |
Austrians | 99.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 48.6% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 48.6% |
Poles | 99.2 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 48.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 48.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 48.5% |
Croatians | 99.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bulgarians | 99.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 48.5% |
Luxembourgers | 99.1 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 48.5% |
Basques | 99.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Northern Europeans | 99.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Immigrants | Canada | 99.0 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Jordanians | 98.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Romanians | 98.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Ecuadorian (43.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Moroccan (43.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (43.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Bangladeshi (43.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Cree (43.6%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 43.7% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 43.6% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 43.6% |
Cree | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 43.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 43.5% |
Moroccans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 43.5% |
Ecuadorians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 43.5% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 43.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 43.4% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 43.3% |
Yuman | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 43.3% |
Guatemalans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 43.3% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 43.2% |
Ethiopians | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 43.2% |
Nigerians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 43.2% |