Immigrants from China vs Chickasaw Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
✖
Chickasaw
✖
Family Households
✖
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from China
Chickasaw
64.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
86.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Chickasaw Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,596,066 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.171 and weighted average of 64.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 64.4%, a difference of 0.47%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from China | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 36.8% | 40.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 63.2% | 60.0% |
| Mean | 66.8% | 67.1% |
| Median | 67.1% | 67.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.5% | 62.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 74.9% | 72.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.4% | 10.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.3% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.3% | 8.8% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Scotland (64.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Maltese (64.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Basque (64.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Jamaica (64.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (64.7%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 91.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 90.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 90.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Cajuns | 89.4 /100 | #132 | Excellent 64.8% |
| Belizeans | 89.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 64.8% |
| Greeks | 88.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Maltese | 87.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | China | 86.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 86.4 /100 | #137 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Basques | 85.5 /100 | #138 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 85.3 /100 | #139 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.9 /100 | #140 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 84.8 /100 | #141 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Pakistanis | 84.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Czechoslovakians | 82.1 /100 | #143 | Excellent 64.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Scotch-Irish (64.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
| Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
| Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
| Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
| British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
| Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 60.0 /100 | #165 | Good 64.4% |
| Scotch-Irish | 59.2 /100 | #166 | Average 64.4% |
| Irish | 57.9 /100 | #167 | Average 64.4% |
| Hondurans | 57.5 /100 | #168 | Average 64.4% |
| Iraqis | 56.0 /100 | #169 | Average 64.4% |
| Armenians | 55.9 /100 | #170 | Average 64.4% |