Immigrants from El Salvador vs Inupiat Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from El Salvador
Inupiat
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from El Salvador
Inupiat
67.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
67.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Inupiat Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,711,776 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.277 and weighted average of 67.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,321,767 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.461 and weighted average of 67.8%, a difference of 1.2%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from El Salvador | Inupiat |
Minimum | 51.1% | 27.3% |
Maximum | 95.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 43.8% | 72.7% |
Mean | 70.2% | 73.1% |
Median | 69.5% | 70.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 66.4% | 63.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 73.9% | 83.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 19.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 13.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 13.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from El Salvador and Inupiat by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from El Salvador are Mexican American Indian (67.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Tsimshian (67.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Peruvian (67.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Tohono O'odham (67.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and Salvadoran (67.2%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Cuban (67.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Sri Lankan (67.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Pakistan (67.7%, a difference of 0.17%), Samoan (67.9%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (67.5%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Samoans | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 67.9% |
Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 67.8% |
Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 67.7% |
Sri Lankans | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 67.7% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 67.7% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 67.5% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 67.5% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 67.4% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 67.4% |
Hawaiians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 67.4% |
Nicaraguans | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 67.4% |
Immigrants | Peru | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 67.2% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 67.2% |
Nepalese | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 67.2% |
Salvadorans | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 67.2% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 67.2% |
Tohono O'odham | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 67.1% |
Peruvians | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 67.1% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 67.1% |
Mexican American Indians | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 67.0% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 67.0% |