Immigrants from El Salvador vs Ute Average Family Size
COMPARE
Immigrants from El Salvador
Ute
Average Family Size
Average Family Size Comparison
Immigrants from El Salvador
Ute
3.49
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.49
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Ute Average Family Size Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,696,345 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.629 and weighted average of 3.49. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,658,636 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.343 and weighted average of 3.49, a difference of 0.090%.
Average Family Size Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from El Salvador | Ute |
Minimum | 3.00 | 2.47 |
Maximum | 4.63 | 5.13 |
Range | 1.63 | 2.66 |
Mean | 3.70 | 3.69 |
Median | 3.66 | 3.52 |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.49 | 3.19 |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.85 | 4.38 |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.36 | 1.19 |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.30 | 0.67 |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.30 | 0.66 |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from El Salvador and Ute by Average Family Size
In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from El Salvador are Tongan (3.49, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Central America (3.49, a difference of 0.19%), Salvadoran (3.48, a difference of 0.25%), Mexican (3.48, a difference of 0.32%), and Cheyenne (3.47, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Tongan (3.49, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Central America (3.49, a difference of 0.11%), Salvadoran (3.48, a difference of 0.34%), Mexican (3.48, a difference of 0.40%), and Cheyenne (3.47, a difference of 0.45%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Average Family Size |
Arapaho | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.64 |
Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.63 |
Immigrants | Yemen | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.60 |
Hopi | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.60 |
Spanish American Indians | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.58 |
Tohono O'odham | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 3.53 |
Immigrants | Mexico | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 3.52 |
Sioux | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 3.52 |
Immigrants | Central America | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 3.49 |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 3.49 |
Ute | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 3.49 |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 3.49 |
Salvadorans | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 3.48 |
Mexicans | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 3.48 |
Cheyenne | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 3.47 |
Yuman | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 3.47 |
Apache | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 3.46 |
Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 3.45 |
Natives/Alaskans | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 3.45 |
Yakama | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 3.45 |
Native Hawaiians | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 3.43 |