Immigrants from England vs Subsaharan African Currently Married
COMPARE
Immigrants from England
Subsaharan African
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Immigrants from England
Sub-Saharan Africans
48.3%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
98.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
42.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
292nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from England vs Subsaharan African Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 391,864,919 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.477 and weighted average of 48.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,112,533 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018 and weighted average of 42.6%, a difference of 13.5%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from England | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 10.0% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 84.5% |
Range | 90.0% | 82.7% |
Mean | 57.9% | 40.3% |
Median | 54.0% | 40.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 51.0% | 35.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 65.3% | 44.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.3% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.3% | 14.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.1% | 13.9% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from England by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Slovak (48.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Tongan (48.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Canadian (48.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Ukrainian (48.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and Slavic (48.4%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Romanians | 98.5 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Asians | 98.5 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Slavs | 98.3 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.3 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Ukrainians | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Tongans | 98.2 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 48.3% |
Slovaks | 98.2 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 48.3% |
Immigrants | England | 98.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 48.3% |
Canadians | 98.1 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 48.3% |
Immigrants | Asia | 97.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 48.3% |
Macedonians | 97.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 48.3% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 97.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 48.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 97.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 48.2% |
Estonians | 97.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 48.2% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 97.2 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 48.1% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Yuman (42.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Honduran (42.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Guatemala (42.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Ghana (42.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and Paiute (42.7%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 43.0% |
Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.9% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.9% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.8% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.7% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.7% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.6% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.6% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.5% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.4% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 42.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 42.2% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 42.2% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 42.2% |