Immigrants from Oceania vs Celtic Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Celtic
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Celtics
30.6%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
81.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
33.3%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
10.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Celtic Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 287,126,305 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.518 and weighted average of 30.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,463,744 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 33.3%, a difference of 8.9%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Celtic |
Minimum | 8.4% | 14.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 91.6% | 86.0% |
Mean | 45.6% | 47.2% |
Median | 33.0% | 39.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 29.6% | 31.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 59.6% | 55.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 29.9% | 24.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.4% | 24.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.9% | 24.5% |
Similar Demographics by Births to Unmarried Women
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Northern European (30.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from North America (30.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Czech (30.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Uganda (30.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and South African (30.5%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Swiss | 83.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 30.5% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #141 | Excellent 30.5% |
South Africans | 82.7 /100 | #142 | Excellent 30.5% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 82.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 30.5% |
Czechs | 82.1 /100 | #144 | Excellent 30.5% |
Immigrants | North America | 81.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 30.6% |
Northern Europeans | 81.4 /100 | #146 | Excellent 30.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 81.2 /100 | #147 | Excellent 30.6% |
Chileans | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 30.7% |
Serbians | 78.8 /100 | #149 | Good 30.7% |
Somalis | 77.8 /100 | #150 | Good 30.7% |
Italians | 77.0 /100 | #151 | Good 30.8% |
Poles | 76.2 /100 | #152 | Good 30.8% |
British | 76.0 /100 | #153 | Good 30.8% |
Yugoslavians | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 30.8% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Ecuadorian (33.3%, a difference of 0.070%), White/Caucasian (33.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Scotch-Irish (33.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (33.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Slovak (33.4%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
German Russians | 13.1 /100 | #205 | Poor 33.1% |
Uruguayans | 12.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 33.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 33.2% |
Hawaiians | 11.3 /100 | #208 | Poor 33.2% |
Whites/Caucasians | 10.7 /100 | #209 | Poor 33.3% |
Scotch-Irish | 10.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 33.3% |
Ecuadorians | 10.5 /100 | #211 | Poor 33.3% |
Celtics | 10.2 /100 | #212 | Poor 33.3% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 9.5 /100 | #213 | Tragic 33.4% |
Slovaks | 9.3 /100 | #214 | Tragic 33.4% |
French | 8.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 33.4% |
Nepalese | 7.8 /100 | #216 | Tragic 33.5% |
Spaniards | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 33.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 5.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 33.7% |
Alsatians | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 33.8% |