Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Italy Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Immigrants from Italy
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Immigrants from Italy
64.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
94.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
90.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
130th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Italy Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,389,085 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.567 and weighted average of 64.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 324,146,705 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Italy and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.007 and weighted average of 64.8%, a difference of 0.19%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from Italy |
| Minimum | 8.8% | 43.1% |
| Maximum | 91.4% | 100.0% |
| Range | 82.6% | 56.9% |
| Mean | 64.5% | 67.9% |
| Median | 67.1% | 68.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.7% | 63.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 71.6% | 74.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.8% | 10.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.4% | 11.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.2% | 11.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Italy by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (64.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Hungarian (64.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Hmong (64.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Choctaw (64.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and Dutch (64.9%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Italy are Nonimmigrants (64.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Cajun (64.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Belizean (64.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ecuador (64.8%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Panama (64.8%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Ecuadorians | 95.4 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 95.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Cherokee | 95.3 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Dutch | 95.1 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 94.2 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Hungarians | 94.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Hmong | 93.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Choctaw | 93.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 92.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 92.7 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Panamanians | 92.4 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 92.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Italians | 91.9 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 91.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 90.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 90.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Cajuns | 89.4 /100 | #132 | Excellent 64.8% |
| Belizeans | 89.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 64.8% |
| Greeks | 88.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Maltese | 87.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 64.7% |