Immigrants from Scotland vs African Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Scotland
African
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Immigrants from Scotland
Africans
49.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
40.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Scotland vs African Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,383,501 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.044 and weighted average of 49.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,585,166 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Africans and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.071 and weighted average of 40.9%, a difference of 20.3%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Scotland | African |
Minimum | 23.8% | 12.5% |
Maximum | 84.6% | 72.3% |
Range | 60.9% | 59.8% |
Mean | 55.5% | 36.0% |
Median | 53.0% | 36.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 48.2% | 31.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 62.1% | 39.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.9% | 8.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.8% | 10.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.7% | 10.2% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Scotland by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Scotland are Bhutanese (49.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Philippines (49.3%, a difference of 0.13%), German (49.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Maltese (49.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and Bolivian (49.2%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 49.6% |
Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 49.6% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 49.5% |
Asians | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 49.5% |
Dutch | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 49.5% |
Czechs | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 49.4% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 49.3% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 49.3% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 49.3% |
Germans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 49.2% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 49.2% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 49.2% |
Native Hawaiians | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 49.1% |
Hungarians | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 49.1% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 49.1% |
Demographics Similar to Africans by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Africans are Immigrants from Haiti (40.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Colville (41.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Jamaican (40.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (40.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Caribbean (40.8%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 41.5% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 41.4% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 41.4% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 41.4% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 41.2% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 41.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 41.0% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 40.9% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 40.9% |
Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 40.9% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 40.9% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 40.8% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 40.7% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 40.7% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 40.5% |