Immigrants from Syria vs Palestinian Family Households with Children

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 174,092,818 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Syria and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.023 and weighted average of 28.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,372,515 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.233 and weighted average of 28.1%, a difference of 1.0%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Syria	Palestinian
Minimum	16.1%	13.1%
Maximum	45.3%	57.1%
Range	29.2%	44.1%
Mean	28.8%	28.4%
Median	28.3%	27.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	26.8%	24.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	30.7%	31.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	3.9%	6.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.7%	7.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.7%	7.6%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Syria and Palestinians by Family Households with Children

In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Syria are Costa Rican (28.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Africa (28.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Colombian (28.3%, a difference of 0.31%), Liberian (28.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (28.3%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Sioux (28.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (28.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Oceania (28.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from the Azores (28.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Indonesian (28.1%, a difference of 0.15%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Family Households with Children
Costa Ricans	99.8 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 28.4%
Immigrants \| Syria	99.8 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 28.4%
Immigrants \| Western Africa	99.6 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 28.3%
Colombians	99.6 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 28.3%
Liberians	99.6 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 28.3%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	99.6 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 28.3%
Immigrants \| Thailand	99.5 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 28.2%
Immigrants \| Liberia	99.4 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 28.2%
Chickasaw	99.4 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 28.2%
Panamanians	99.3 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 28.2%
Immigrants \| Colombia	99.2 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 28.2%
Immigrants \| Nicaragua	99.1 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 28.2%
Ute	99.1 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 28.2%
Chileans	98.9 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| Kenya	98.9 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| Azores	98.8 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 28.1%
Indonesians	98.8 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| Oceania	98.8 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 28.1%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	98.7 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 28.1%
Palestinians	98.5 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 28.1%
Sioux	98.3 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 28.1%